CFRL English News No.10 (March 10, 2000)
Cold Fusion
Research Laboratory Prof. Hideo Kozima
This is CFRL News (in English) No.10 translated from Japanese version published for friend researchers of Cold Fusion Research Laboratory directed by Dr. H. Kozima.
In this issue, there is following items.
1)
Summary of our new paper, H. Kozima and K. Kaki,
“Anomalous Nuclear Reactions in Solids Revealed by CF Experiments” Rep. Fac. Science, Shizuoka Univ.34, 1 (2000),
2)
About a paper by J.O’M. Bockris appeared in J. New
Energy,
3)
About MITI Project to Treat High-Level Radioactive
Waste,
4)
Our three papers appeared in Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy,
5)
About Tsvetkov’s patent,
6)
On the Missing
Factor.
1) Our new paper was published in Report
of Faculty of Science, Shizuoka University. Please ask Dr. K. Kaki for an
offprint of this paper by the following e-mail address
:<spkkaki@ipc.shizuoka.ac.jp>
H. Kozima and K. Kaki, “Anomalous
Nuclear Reactions in Solids Revealed by CF Experiments” Rep. Fac. Science, Shizuoka Univ. Vol.34, 1 (2000).
Abstract.
Anomalous nuclear reactions in solids detected through events in the so-called cold fusion (CF) phenomenon are investigated from a viewpoint of the TNCF model where interaction of the neutron Bloch waves and a nucleus in crystal boundary plays a key role. Using the experimental facts of nuclear transmutation (NT) in the surface region, it is shown that a compound nucleus, formed by absorption of a neutron, interacting with residual neutron waves has different characteristics responsible to the anomalous reactions observed in the cold fusion phenomenon from those of the isolated compound nucleus. A unified picture of the anomalous nuclear reactions in solids is given on the interaction of the trapped neutron Bloch waves and a lattice nucleus.
2) A new paper by J. O’M. Bockris appeared in J. New Energy where he explains research works in his laboratory
sometimes denounced in journalistic writings.
“”Early Contributions from Workers at Texas A&M University to
(so-called) Low Energy Nuclear Reactions” J.
New Energy Vol. 4-2, 40 - 69
(1999)
In this paper, the author summarizes and tells truth of the CF research in his group in Texas A&M University, which was deteriorated by a journalist G. Taubes in an article in the journal Science, and the scandalous book. As was well known, Taubes wrote the tritium data obtained in the experiment done by Bockris’s group as if a graduate student J.C. Packham added solution of tritium in water into the experimental cell. Taubes also has written a scandalous story about S. Pons’ experiment where occurred melting of Pd cathode.
Some
quasi-scientists have influenced by these articles and rejected existence of CF
phenomenon without checking experimental data themselves. Most of them seem to
belong mathematical physicists working in the fields distant from experimental
facts.
After the
publication of the English version of my book “Discovery”, there have been increasing people who understand nature
and ability of a model to investigate new phenomenon. Bockris has also
expressed his understanding of a model in the concluding part of this paper as
follows:
“2. The work must give
rise to modifications of the theory of the nucleus. However, new physics is
probably not needed. Classical nuclear physicists have maintained an agnostic
stance for so long because their knowledge of fusion is concerned with
reactions in plasma, and they have paid little attention to the effects of a
solid lattice upon nuclear activity within it after injection of H and D at high
fugacity, or to the effect of free
neutrons in the lattice.” (Italicized by H.K.)
In his
understanding of the TNCF model is, however, not sufficient from my viewpoint
and write about irreproducibility as
follows:
“Viewing all this in
retrospect, and now knowing the results of more than 100 other groups,
irreproducibility is a key characteristic of the field. Any theory of
chemically assisted nuclear activity must be able to embrace and explain this
fact. (None of the theories hitherto
has addressed it.)” (Underlined by J.B. Italicized by H.K.)
The
irreproducibility of CFP is a remarkable nature but is rather characterized by
another work qualitative reproducibility as
written by me often in papers and in the book. This characteristic is explained
as a natural result of stochastic atomic processes necessary to prepare
conditions to trap thermal neutrons and to induce nuclear reactions in solids
from the viewpoint of the TNCF model. This is the only existing reasonable
explanation of qualitative reproducibility of CFP ignored by Bockris.
The defamation of J.C.
Packham by G. Taubes seems rooted in the competition in the University, as is
often the case with researchers. People without talent tend to spend their time
not for their duty but for useless or rather harmful activities to spoil
atmosphere of sincere activity to create and keep academicism. Following
sentences (p.49, footnote) by Bockris shows a situation in TAMU excited by
Taubes’ articles, in Science
(Vol.248, pp.1299-1303, June 15, 1990) and in the book.
“One of the less pleasant realizations which came from the Taubes’
article in Science is that a
scientist, defamed, has, in practice, no means of redress by appeal to the law.
If he had $M to risk on a lawsuit, he would have to prove not only that the
defaming statements were untrue but also that the publishing house concerned
was intentionally trying to damage him. To prove malice is, of course,
extremely difficult. In fact, Taubes (who told me that he writes scenarios in
the movie industry part-time) certainly had no personal malice. However,
he certainly wanted to sell his book, and books for public consumption do not
sell on the basis of descriptions of the importance of eliminating errors in
radioactive experiments. They sell best if they report evidence of something wrong.
That there is a public which likes this is beautifully confirmed by the German
word “Schadenfreude,” which means, essentially, “Injury Joy or Happiness in
Hurting.””
3) On Treatment of Nuclear Waste in Japan reported by The Mainichi, January 27, 2000.
“MITI (Ministry of
International Trade and Industry) of Japan declared to submit a law ‘Law to
Promote Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste’ to Shuugiin (The House of
Representatives) by the end of February (to treat waste expected to produced by
2015) in which a standard family pays 14 yen each month in addition to power
rate from this October.
As was reported in
the News No.8, the proposal by G. Miley to NERI of DOE was finally canceled
after accept by the Review Committee. In Japan, the NHE project lasted four
years from 1994 was sentenced to death without remarkable positive result to
continue the project further. Irrespective of these negative trends, there are
facts showing effective nuclear transmutation in CF system, which hopefully
applied to eliminate hazardous radioactivity of the nuclear waste.
The project panned
by MITI is based on ‘burial in deep underground after glass-solidification of
nuclear waste’. The technology of the disposal, however, is not accomplished
yet. Furthermore, the waste expected after 2015 is not accounted in this
project at all. Thus, the project is considered as tentative even if the budget
estimated was about 300 billion yen as a whole.
As a technology,
nuclear power generation system has to include from mining of Uranium ore to
treatment of waste while it was launched missing the last part. The system
should be terminated gradually if the system as a closed one is estimated
unprofitable. CFP should be taken up as a basis to treat the final step of the
nuclear power generation system.
We have no
information that MITI is considering alternatives for glass-solidification of
the waste.
4) Our paper announced in News No.7, 1) was published in Il Nuovo Cimento 112A,
1431 (1999). Offprint of this paper will be asked to Dr. K. Kaki of Shizuoka
Univ.
H. Kozima, M. Fujii, M.
Ohta, K. Arai, H. Kudoh and K. Kaki, "Analysis of Energy Spectrum of
Neutrons Measured in Cold Fusion Experiments by the TNCF Model" Il Nuovo Cimento 112A, 1431 (1999).
5) Our three papers submitted and introduced in previous News (Nos. 3, 4,
6 and 8) were decided to be
published in Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy
Vol. 25, No.6, p.505, 509 and 513 (2000).
H. Kozima, K. Yoshimoto
and K. Arai, "First Reliable Tritium Data by Packham et al. analyzed by
TNCF Model" Intern. J. Hydrogen
Energy 25, 505 (2000),
H. Kozima, K. Arai and K.
Yoshimoto, "Tritium and 4He Data by Chien et al. confirmed
the Cold Fusion Phenomenon" Intern.
J. Hydrogen Energy 25, 509
(2000).
H. Kozima and K. Arai, “Localized
Nuclear Transmutation in PdHx Observed by Bockris et al. Revealed a
Characteristic of CF Phenomenon”
Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy 25, 513
(2000).
6) S. Tsvetkov in Russia is eager to find collaborators to develop
his patented idea and wrote me following mail. Please contact him by his e-mail
address written below who are interested in his patent and its development.
“Dear Dr. H. Kozima,
I dispatch to you by the
associated file the abstract of my Russian patent in English. I offer you to
publish it in your monthly news with the message on search of the partners for
carrying out of collateral operations and indication mine of e-mail of the
address.
Best regards
Sergey Tsvetkov” <ts@zar.eps.ru>
7) On Missing Factor (1)
It is desirable
to contemplate about the Missing Factor proposed by the author as a key concept
of theory or model to clarify confusion around cold fusion phenomenon CFP.
As described in the
preceding News (No. 9, (5)), there is a wide boundary region between Science (a
set of juubakos) and non-science in
which a new science will born and grow. Recently, it is discussed often
importance of inter-disciplinary region of sciences. This is also a trend to
put eyes in the minor structure of the boundary region between science and
non-science.
A new science is
characterized by the Missing Factor,
in the old theory proposed by me in the CF research to make clear character of
theoretical models and theories. To understand the meaning of the missing
factor, it is useful to illustrate it using historical examples. Two examples
we take up here are Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics.
Two great
discoveries of 20 century in physics are Theory of Relativity and Quantum
Mechanics. What are then the missing factors of them?
The missing factor
found in the Theory of Relativity is the
Principle of Constant Light Speed, or that the speed of light is
independent of the motion of the source of the light and also independent of
the reference system from which the speed is measured. On the other hand, the
missing factor found in the Quantum Theory is the Principle of Action Quantum, or existence of the minimum value
(Planck’s constant h) for action of
any motion in nature.
Science is a
unified and self-consistent system of explanation for empirical events, which
does not allow any exception. When experimental data are confirmed which are
inconsistent with a system or a logical conclusion is deduced which is
inconsistent with principles of the system, a new clue to reconcile these
contradictions is sought. The history of developments of Theory of Relativity
and Quantum Mechanics is exciting to not only physicists but also to people
interested in the development of human knowledge. (To be continued.)