Discovery of the Cold Fusion Phenomenon

Dieter Britz, 1999

Abstracts and review of:

Hideo Kozima "Discovery of the Cold Fusion Phenomenon" and Tadahiko Mizuno, "Nuclear Transmutation: The Reality of Cold Fusion".

I'll deviate from my practice these days of not posting updates here, as I used to do, and will post my latest updates of the Books file, having just read the two Japanese books below. Here are the abstracts that went into the file:

Kozima Hideo; "Discovery of the Cold Fusion Phenomenon". Subtitle: "Development of Solid Stat-Nuclear Physics and the Energy Crisis in the 21st Century". Ohtake Shuppan Inc., Tokyo, 1998. 370 pp. SBN 4-87186-044-2 Translation and partial revision of the earlier Japanese book of the same title, Ohtake Shuppan Inc., Tokyo 1997.

** Kozima is associated in the cold fusion area with his TNCF (trapped neutron catalyzed fusion) theory, and this book focuses on the theory.  Kozima was one of the first to attempt a replication of the FPH paper, immediately he received a telefaxed preprint of the FPH89 and the Jones group's paper in 1989.

He was fortunate also to get results at the first attempt, in the form of neutrons. He soon realized that the process(es) are/were stochastic, and therefore difficult to repeat at will. The early history, starting with Paneth & Peters in 1926, is given, then moving on to Fleischmann and Pons and on from there. The major groups and their findings/claims are gone through, problem areas are identified, such as the "riddles of cold fusion", summarized succinctly at the end of chapter 9.

Then in chapter 11, TNCF is outlined and all the riddles treated with the theory.  A single parameter, the density of trapped neutrons in the reaction space, is required to Quantitatively account for a large number of observations. The neutrons come initially from cosmic infall, later from the reactions leading on from the initial reactions of neutrons with various species. There is at last a table of 53 cases, where TNCF explains observations reasonably well. Other proposed theories are then also described, critically. There are hundreds of references including close to 100 by the author himself.

Some additional remarks:

It is interesting (to me) to compare the two books. Kozima's is sharply focused, being a long outline of how his TNCF theory fits most of the observations, which are first listed in detail, followed by the problems (riddles) they throw up. These are then solved by the application of TNCF, all by the adjustment of a single parameter (different in the different cases).

Both books are very persuasive in their different ways. Kozima persuades by the seemingly universal applicability of TNCF; I did get a slight feeling of unease, however, whether I was perhaps being lulled into acceptance by the omission of problems with that. For example, TNCF does not explain how all those nuclear products, most of them highly energetic, get away without giving rise to a host of secondaries. Kozima acknowledges the problem and is working on it. One thing that gives one an "Aha!" is Kozima's suggestion of a reaction of neutrons with ^{6}Li; this immediately explains the sometime claim that CNF works in LiOD electrolyte, but not in NaOD. Kozima is not uncritical of others' work, although I wonder at his easy acceptance of Kervran's nonsense - which seems to have a long history going back to 1799, and that is another interesting aspect of Kozima's book. But he does appear to make a good case for his theory. 

  Kozima's book was done by the man himself and the English was checked later by someone else, I believe. There is a strong accent.  Oddly, this makes the text quite punchy in its rather informal way, not at all awkward to read.

We have been told often that the Japanese are running away with cold fusion that the USA is behind. Well, the Japanese seem to feel it's the other way around, and Mizuno describes widespread skepticism in Japan and even some skullduggery to prevent CNF research, heckling at a conference, etc., and Kozima mentions publication problems in Japanese journals.

All in all, a couple of interesting books, well worth getting and reading.  I have been asked whether these books change my opinion of CNF at all.  I am not sure about that; but that question, and reading these books, crystallized in my mind the thought that the term "skeptic" is not, and has not been, very appropriate to me. A better term would be "agnostic"; I simply don't know, and I leave it at that.

-- Dieter Britz alias db@kemi.aau.dk;  http://www.kemi.aau.dk/~db